![]() ![]() The lowest HDR exposure you need is the one that captures all the details in the brightest highlight that should retain details while letting specular highlights or things like bright street lights or the sun* overexpose. Taking the right HDR exposures is actually easy once you understand what exposures are needed. Of the other DNG software mentioned I prefer Aurora. You can then tone map and edit to your hearts content in Lightroom or Photoshop. Lightroom combines the images to produce a 32- bit DNG file, that is a pseudo RAW file. My general preference is natural and Lightroom is the best I have found, and producing a HDR file couldn't be easier. Whether the software produced final result is natural or garish is entirely up to you and both types have their places. The second is to use the software that gives you the desired results. ![]() The first thing to do with HDR is to take the right exposures. Currently running LR/PS and looking for a tone map app. Photomatix Pro appears to be withering on the vine.Īny thoughts on which HDR works best. Oloneo appears to be somewhere in Europe which may charge VAT. I am a little apprehensive a product with no support. However after reading the postings on this forum IRT batch processing bug and no customer service. ![]() There appears to be a lot of marketing for Aurora. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |